In response to the article "AOC's Munich Stumble Is a Warnign to the Left: : https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/aocs-munich-stumble-is-a-warning-to-the-left.html?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=s1&utm_campaign=nym
The left doing what it does best, eating its own.
Sure, I respect that our "side" can critique itself. After all, one of the most repelling traits of the conservative/MAGA crowd is that they're not only hypocrites who will criticize the other side for doing (usually a lesser version of) exactly the thing they have done or will eventually do, but they almost never call each other out, even in the most egregious and obvious circumstances. They don't talk outside of the house, if you wll, very much. They defend, deflect, and deter against all threats. They shrug off inelegance and ineloquence like a colleague's public flatulation one is too polite to acknowledge awareness. But Dems and libs? We see one of ours fuck up and we go blasting it in our own media platforms because, as the adults in the room, so to speak, we hold ourselves to a higher standard than the other side.
And here we have one of the most unapologetically left-leaning media platforms, New York mag, telling the world that AOC not only farted in Munich, but that she shit the bed. That she should never be a contender for the White House.
Yes, AOC (who I have conflicting feelings about but overall like and respect) was clumsy and seemed unprepared in her response to this question about Taiwan and China. And as a woman and a POC, she's already a target so any legitimate stumble is going to, well, garner exactly the attention it's getting. But, were she a man or a wyte person or both, would her stuttering just seem like someone searching for the right words? Or would clear and blatant unpreparedness be forgiveable? And were she a conservative figure, would this even be news? From the president on down, many of the representatives in the conservative party proudly flaunt their ignorance. Geography, history, culture, language, their ignorance traverses all areas of international or multicultural details, let alone pedantics, and it's almost as if there's some kind of pride in flaunting their ignorance of anything outside of wyte American Christian culture, a dog-whistle of their prideful xenophobia. Liberals, on the other hand, are supposed to be the smarty pantses, the culture vultures, the multilingual, scientific oriented world-travelers who somehow find the time to finish every issue of the New Yorker and the Economist, along with the dailies and their corresponding podcasts, primed and ready even in REM sleep to answer any question about any historical fact or current conflict -- with footnotes-- or risk looking like, heaven forbid, they don't know everything. And as a WOC, the whiff of "See, this is what happens when they get the opportunities they're always asking for or lamenting about not getting" turns on full stank.
AOC didn't have an answer ready. Which meant, God forbid, she had to think about it as we waited in real time to watch her think through a question about a complicated situation, as opposed to having a prepared soundbite ready at the gate. Sorry, but I'll take the ums and uhs over mindless drivel any day.
Because she was thinking. And we watched her think for 20 seconds before she delivered an answer that was worthy of the question.